Altra FWD VIA – Review

After putting over 700km into my last shoe, it was time to move on. I returned to Footkaki, which had fitted me with my previous shoe, and they recommended the Altra FWD VIA because of its fit and stability. I had asked why they did not recommend an updated version of my previous shoe and they said that their tests showed that stability had taken a hit. Took their word for it and paired it with the Footbionics footbed (also fitted for me). Here is how it has gone so far.

Good

  1. Stable. Well, as expected, it fit my foot well and offered great ankle stability. I have a slight but long running ITB issue and this ensured I could go the distance without pain.
  2. Lightweight. Coming from previous shoes like the Asics Kayano and the Hoka Gaviota, the FWD VIA was noticeably lighter. It makes a difference on longer runs.
  3. Toebox. Incredibly spacious. I have not had a wider toebox than this. I have semi-wide feet and this was more than sufficient. Frankly, I think most shoes (including cycling variants) should cater for wider toeboxes. No harm in giving toes more wiggle room.

Not so good

  1. Stiff. I am not too experienced with energy return shoes but this pair started off rather stiff with little returns. It loosened up after a few runs and offered better returns but this is still not the shoe if you want that springy feeling.

Overall, another good experience getting a well-fitting shoe from Footkaki (not sponsored), and looking forward to putting a few hundred kilometers into this pair.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *